Search for: "In Re Applications T-61 and T-62" Results 81 - 100 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2015, 2:37 am by Dave
 I haven’t got on to the extension of the right to family members but that is superfluous to this discussion. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
 The first is that one should give a purposive construction to the intentionality provision (see for example [56], [61]. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Moeser also observes that some law schools accept more transfer applicants these days (perhaps in part because this is a way to keep a school’s headcount and tuition dollars high without diluting the admissions credentials of the entering first-year class, since the characteristics of persons who transfer in as second-year students aren’t included in those credentials). [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
He asked whether such an approach effectively permitted the court to “re-do or re-make” an administrative decision to save it from being overturned on judicial review. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
” Recommendation at 3, citing In re New York Renu with Moistureloc Prod. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:37 pm by Sanjana
As the Human Genome Project noted over a decade ago[9], Translating the text of the human genome into practical applications that will alleviate suffering is one of the greatest challenges facing humankind. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
 Larger Than life - (1996) (Elephant) (Bill Murray) 61. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
Usually, when a government does this, it's a good bet that they're hoping the scent from the more attractive story will mask the odour of the less attractive one. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Here is the application, in PDF and text: NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (ELLEN SMITH, APPLICANT) (Pursuant to Section 40 of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 25 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) APPLICANT (Respondent) RESPONDENT (Appellant) TAKE NOTICE that Ellen Smith hereby applies for leave to appeal to the Court, pursuant to sections 40 and 43 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
In In re the Estate of Johnny Vajgrt, Bill Ernst, Inc., Intervenor (IA Sup. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Pour les bases juridiques : articles 2 et 3 de la décision du Présidium du 28 octobre 2002 (JO 2003, 62) ensemble la décision du CA du 12 décembre 2002 (JO 2003, 61). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The present decision is not surprising at all but it presents us with a nice application of the “suitable for ... [read post]