Search for: "In Re Interest of JA"
Results 81 - 95
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2012, 10:02 am
In re Paoli RR Yard PCB Litig., 706 F. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
Last week, we posted a highly unusual motion from Arizona. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:27 pm
This is a subject that’s near and dear to my heart and I appreciate your interest in it. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
Justices Middleton, Jagot and Moshinsky identified three errors of principle in Justice Perram’s evaluation of ‘strong reasons’, enabling them to re-evaluate whether strong reasons existed. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:22 am
The size of Sweden8.9 million inhabitants occupy the fourth largest country in Europe. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 11:43 pm
But knowing that the boldfaced ones are actually contractions helps to make sense of how they're pronounced. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
Anyone interested in the future of military commissions needs to read this piece carefully–and read it to the end. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 11:14 am
One of the more interesting manifestations of the role of religion within political life is that of the priests of the practitioners of the old religions of Africa as re-established in the Western Hemisphere, particularly in Marxist-Leninist Cuba. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:08 am
Questions 1 and 2 are interesting for querying the extent of the right to be heard in proceedings before the EPO. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:53 am
We’re still helping them. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
It gave McIntyre a life-long interest in the subject in general and a particular fondness for Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.[7] Given this deep affinity between philosophy and law, one might expect to see explicit references to the major philosophers in the decisions written by judges.[8] This study discusses the extent to which this is true. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
This memo was written for an upcoming workers’ compensation trial. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:36 pm
JA Cummings, Inc., 212 So.3d 1060, 1062-63 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding JCC erred by excluding adjuster’s testimony concerning specific identity of condition accepted as compensable as it related to application of subsection 440.20(4) to preexisting condition); McIntosh v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Without question, the most interesting part of the case involves Nigel Wright’s infamous decision to pay Duffy’s expenses for him – the $90,000 cheque that forms the basis of three specific charges against Duffy. [read post]
