Search for: "LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES"
Results 81 - 100
of 284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
These licenses, however, were “radically different” from the hypothetical license between Lucent and Gateway, in terms of both economic circumstances and technological subject matter. [read post]
7 May 2011, 5:16 am
"**As to the MIT Technology Review on biofuels, see the IPBiz post Technology Review speaks of 20,000 gal/(acre year) biofuel production**Remember what the MIT Technology Review said of Jan-Hendrik Schon: But it won’t be a surprise if Schön helps transform microelectronics. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:23 pm
Lucent Technologies, Inc., the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an employee termination after a one-year disability accommodation leave. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:15 am
Lucent Technologies, Inc., the Ninth Circuit held this week that disability discrimination and failure to accommodate could not be proven against an employer who terminated an employee after a year of leave due to the employee's disability. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:28 pm
Rembrandt Data Technologies v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:17 am
And, how did Lucent v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
The Evidence of Age Discrimination Nicholas Saffos worked for Avaya, Inc. and its predecessors, AT&T and Lucent Technologies, for more than 20 years. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
Cir. 2011) (holding that the 25% Rule for calculating patent damages is “fundamentally flawed” and that total product revenue cannot be considered in the reasonable royalty analysis unless the Entire Market Value Rule applies.) and Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm
" Other recent decisions - Lucent v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:49 am
Lucent management, which had boosted Schon's work to the media, was not implicated. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:05 pm
"Plaintiff and the attorney defendants entered into a written contingent fee contract for the prosecution of a patent infringement lawsuit against Lucent Technologies. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:14 pm
Cir. 2003) and Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:25 pm
" Lucent Techs.[, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:52 am
Relying on the 25 percent rule of thumb in a reasonable royalty calculation is far more unreliable and irrelevant than reliance on parties’ unrelated licenses, which we rejected in ResQNet and Lucent Technologies.. . . [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Uniloc sued Microsoft over its product activation software, infringing Uniloc's 5,490,216. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:10 am
Rudolph Technologies, Inc., Civil Action No. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm
Beyond Innovation Technology Co., 521 F.3d 1351 (Fed. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
This factor may provide some guidance when the licensee has utilized other technology that is similar to that of the patent-in-suit from third parties.[9] In the past, licenses previously taken by the licensee that may have included other elements, such as services or know-how, could also be considered in the reasonable royalty analysis. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:03 am
., Partner at Sidley Austin LLP, will address the impact recent cases such as Lucent Technologies v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:06 pm
., Partner at Sidley Austin LLP, will address the impact recent cases such as Lucent Technologies v. [read post]
