Search for: "Lewis v. Hope" Results 81 - 100 of 482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2010, 12:50 pm by Adam Levitin
Last week the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey issued an opinion in a case captioned Kemp v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
You might even be OK with the application of Section 230(c)(1) in the cases I’m seeing, including Lewis v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Davidson (Willamette), and Susan Mandiberg (Lewis & Clark). [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:00 pm by Colin O'Keefe
 For everyone owning a bracket that isn't destroyed, I hope it soon will be. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
While Zalewska v Department for Social Development (Northern Ireland) [2008] UKHL 67  is  not a housing case as such, I hope that many of our readers will still find this useful and interesting. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:37 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Today’s roundup brings more on Supreme Court case Kiobel v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
Anders gave a legal history talk discussing the range of responses to Brown v. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 7:06 am
So, I hope that we are found ineffective and that Mr. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am by Ronald Collins
Perhaps most significantly, however, our book documents how, in Philadelphia Newspapers v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 1:07 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
[Ben Reeve Lewis has forgotten to write his column...] [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:33 am by Sandy Levinson
In any event, Lewis Powell may be the most important justice of the last half-century,  not because of his "constitutional decisions," which are all over the place--see, e.g., Rodriguez, McCleskey v. [read post]