Search for: "Marks v. Superintendent"
Results 81 - 100
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
Even not prompted by the latest headlines, every law firm executive committee realizes that its law firm can (and probably will) fall victim to a cyber-attack, and even worse, that the executive committee will need to clean up the mess and superintend the fallout. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:23 am
This appeal marked the First Circuit’s second encounter with this case. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
As a result, these expert recommendations are unfortunately missing their mark. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 8:23 am
In Stensland v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 2:00 pm
O’Bannon v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
************************************* Every board now knows its company will fall victim to a cyber-attack, and even worse, that the board will need to clean up the mess and superintend the fallout. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm
United States Florida: a former superintendent has had his lawsuit against the accounting firm Mauldin & Jenkins dismissed. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Terry v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Terry v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Thus, as Jacob LJ explained in Actavis v Merck at [75], such a claim "is not aimed at and does not touch the doctor - it is directed at the manufacturer. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Consider, for the moment, the case of State v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
These he [the superintendent] stated warranted separation. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
Source. ____ Q: Who was the first Superintendent of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:43 pm
Scott Lane is a plaintiff in the ACLU's case Lane v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:35 am
This week, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a sharply divided 4-3 opinion in Freshwater v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner) Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to discourage… [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm
” Subsequently, in fact, the Court adopted this broader view eight years later in Moore v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:12 am
And this from a man who not too long ago used to put the phrase “Commander-in-Chief” between quotation marks. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:57 am
by Mark B. [read post]
