Search for: "Matter of Nixon C."
Results 81 - 100
of 260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Dooley say that “no matter whether th’ constitution follows th’ flag or not, th’ supreme coort follows th’ iliction returns. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Question: On October 14, 1971, there was an unsigned piece in the New York Times on potential Supreme Court nominees Nixon was then considering. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:05 am
In some cases, he may be correct as a matter of law. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
To be sure, the unbinding of the electors is unlikely to matter if the result of the presidential election is one-sided. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
The district court granted the committee’s motion for summary judgment, holding that it had subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
And the subject matter—“unilateralist presidencies and submissive legislatures”—is of great interest to me. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 5:03 am
So what's the point of hearing additional evidence on the matter? [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
In a perverse way, Trump’s character failings almost make it harder to pin corrupt intent on him: He may very well believe, like King Louis XIV, l'état c'est moi—that he is the state and that anything that’s good for him is good for the country. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:06 am
(Ironically, the exception may be lawyers in high office—Bill Clinton, Richard Nixon, and Spiro Agnew were all disbarred by at least one court.)Perhaps this is my defense hat showing, but I’m always reluctant to tell anyone (even a friend messaging me on Facebook) that a lawyer I only know about from news reports should be or will be disbarred, or suspended for that matter. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 5:31 am
As will be observed in the analysis below, document provenance matters. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
The article then goes on to list three actions as the basis for that charge: (a) directing the White House to defy a subpoena for documents; (b) directing executive branch agencies and offices to defy subpoenas for documents; and (c) directing current and former executive branch officials “not to cooperate with the Committees” and to defy subpoenas for testimony. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am
He named Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator in that case. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:01 am
" Nixon v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
But each largely makes four basic points: (a) The concept of executive privilege is hotly disputed; (b) there are very few relevant court cases and none that provide definitive answers; (c) there are a number of historical incidents, from the administration of George Washington to that of Barack Obama, that are of debatable—and contested—significance; and (d) the legal resolution of these highly disputed questions is likely of little practical significance. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:48 am
Over at National Review, former federal prosecutor Andrew C. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 5:35 am
” Early drafts of the Constitution originally provided only that the president “may” recommend “matters” to Congress. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:00 pm
The under secretary of defense for policy, John C. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
The Data Matters blog from Mischon de Reya had a piece “Children’s data protection rights: a data protection casualty? [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm
” On the second point, the authorization for committee staff to question witnesses is an exercise of Rule XI, clause 2(j)(2)(C) of the House rules, which states that committees may so authorize staff. [read post]
