Search for: "McMillan v. McMillan"
Results 81 - 100
of 238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
Graham v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
Graham v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
McMillan expressly “derived” their subjective standard “from one articulated by Judge Friendly in Johnson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 8:29 am
In McMillan v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:33 am
Dempsey v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:03 am
McMillan, 412 U.S. 306, 312-13 (1973) (“Congressmen . [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
Echoes of R v McMillan Last year, in a very different context, Menzies J. of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench noted in R v McMillan 2013 MBQB 229 that the effects of bullying, both online and in person, must be acknowledged by the courts when fashioning an appropriate sentence. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
See McMillan v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
McMillan LLP v http://t.co/Qg3hLmt1TO, Inc, 2014 TMOB 51 http://t.co/1sks1olqKI -> 1 in 5 U.S. internet users have had sensitive data stolen http://t.co/2750asDQaF -> Illegal download of a cinematographic work in a different language version http://t.co/YHInN0fw0F -> HTC v Nokia: In the United Kingdom will an injunction be granted following a finding of patent infringement? [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 10:00 pm
McMillan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 11:17 am
Expanding the Scope of Offenses Covered
Prior to this announcement, the Integrity Provisions only imposed certification requirements on bidders and their affiliates who were convicted of the following offenses3: (i) frauds against the government under the Criminal Code of Canada; (ii) offenses under the Financial Administration Act; (iii) payments of a contingency fee to a person to whom the Lobbying Act applies; (iv) money laundering; (v) criminal offenses under the… [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:37 am
McMillan died in 2008. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
Dionne,Véronique Iezzoni, Simon Gagné, Sylvain Poirier, Philippe Tremblay, Patrick A. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 5:57 am
Court of Appeals (“COA”) made clear in its January 21, 2014 decision in McMillan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:50 am
, R. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:50 am
, R. v. [read post]
