Search for: "Michel v. Executive Office" Results 81 - 100 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2017, 10:02 am by MBettman
Dennis Stewart, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Michelle Stewart, Deceased v. [read post]
Supreme Court recently decided Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Michelle Meyer, Geisinger Health System, (Still) Waiting to Exhale: Why the Future of Biospecimens Research Remains Unclear after the Final RuleMark Rothstein, University of Louisville School of Medicine, International Health ResearchNicolas Terry, Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:49 pm by Jon Katz
Today, I hit the jackpot by hearing two particularly important criminal oral arguments, one on the prosecution’s duty to disclose Brady/exculpatory evidence to the criminal defense lawyer (Overton v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
But I'm also asked to look and determine if the Executive Order is rationally based. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman had this blog’s preview; Michelle Korkhov and Anna Marienko at Cornell also preview the case. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
Matt Bevin took office on December 8, 2015, the Labor Cabinet changed its position and joined the Fiscal Court in arguing that Smith could and should be fired for reporting a workplace safety issue. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:52 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court ruling issued in January -- Hurst v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 7:54 am by Charlie Dunlap
 And that’s just within the national security community of the executive branch; the gaps in understanding and trust are often even larger when extended to the whole of government. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
  If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees,  you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
  Only Padlo's secretary and another attorney in his office were present during the execution of the documents. [read post]