Search for: "Miller v. Johnson"
Results 81 - 100
of 493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
In that case, R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister, [2019] UKSC 41, on judicial review the UK Supreme Court held that the prorogation had been unlawful. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 7:11 pm
Miller won in Khalil-Alsalaami v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:57 pm
Johnson & Johnston Assoc. v.R.E. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
In the United Kingdom, for a period of 38 days, Boris Johnson’s administration failed to take necessary measures that health experts strongly recommended. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Miller. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:59 pm
Hughs and Miller v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm
In June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am
Indiana, 17-1511Issues: (1) Whether Miller v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:00 am
He helped write the legal briefs in Brown v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
(See Matthews v Tufts, 87 NY 568, 570 [1882], citing Van Lieuw v Johnson, Ct App, Mar. 1871 [unreported].) [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
(See Matthews v Tufts, 87 NY 568, 570 [1882], citing Van Lieuw v Johnson, Ct App, Mar. 1871 [unreported].) [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:58 am
Johnson, 594 F.2d 1253 (9th Cir.) [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
The unanimous decision by Lady Hale and Lord Reed, R (Miller) v Prime Minister, [2019] UKSC 41 (Miller (No 2)) breaks new and, in my view, shaky constitutional ground. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
The phone hacking saga continues with Byline Investigates reporting that Sienna Miller and Sir Simon Hughes have launched claims against the Sun. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The UK Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Miller) v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
See The Queen on application of Gina Miller And Boris Johnson, The Prime Minsiter, High Court of Justice, Queen's Division, Case No: CO/3385/2019, ("A decision to prorogue Parliament is made by the Sovereign formally on the advice of the Privy Council but in reality on the advice of the Prime Minister. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
Its decision in R (on the application of Miller) v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am
Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s decision to prorogue the UK Parliament last week reminded us of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s twice-proroguing of the Canadian Parliament in the space of about a year. [read post]
