Search for: "Murphy v. Sharp*"
Results 81 - 100
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
Mike Murphy is my dude. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
In Winfield v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 10:21 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
On the same day the trial in Ali-Khan v Galloway MP was fixed. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
§§ 1541-48) to the Supreme Court’s 1983 opinion in INS v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
Jury - http://bit.ly/SParA8 (Dan Levine) Apple v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:40 am
http://bit.ly/NxsiOj (Barry Murphy) Social Media – It’s Sort of Discoverable, Right? [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:02 pm
But the most well known contributions (in addition to Klein, Crawford Alchian (1978) and the set of follow up papers in the Coase v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
Gideon v. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 2:14 pm
News Source Vásquez, I., Mitchell, M. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 2:33 pm
(For those interested, there is a long analysis of the concept of using outside counsel by Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law, an analysis directly at odds with this April 6, 2007 blog by Beck/Herrmann;)TortsProf has the jury verdict in a suit against basketball star Allen Iverson's bodyguards;This New York medical malpractice verdict comes courtesy of doctor-attorney Dainius Drukteinis, from NY Emergency Medicine, and involves the amputation of two fingers and delays in the ER with respect to… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
US false advertising law has taken a very different approach to surveys from US TM law, dividing cases sharply into those involving literal falsity, where no other evidence of consumer reaction is required, and implicit falsity where only survey evidence—and usually not expert testimony or testimony from individual consumers—is considered sufficient. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm
As an assistant to New York City’s then-Police Commissioner, Patrick V. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 7:53 am
In Murphy-Hylton v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
bit.ly/yNE968 (Robert Hilson) Improving Collaboration Between Inside and Outside Counsel in E-Discovery - bit.ly/yMgmik (@eDiscoveryBeat) In Civil Litigation, 'Private' Social Media Data Isn't Private - bit.ly/zN4TEq (Aaron Crews) In 'U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Ed Whelan, President of the Ethic and Public Policy Center and a leading conservative voice on Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
