Search for: "Opinion of Justices of Supreme Judicial Court" Results 81 - 100 of 11,480
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
This may be the most important opinion that Justice Kavanaugh has written on the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:47 am by Eric Goldman
(Rhetorical question: has there ever been a more unhelpful and diversionary non-binding “statement” from a Supreme Court justice than this one?) [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am by Vladyslav Lanovoy
I of the Genocide Convention (Statement of Facts and Grounds for Judicial Review (SoF) [124]). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
We want a Supreme Court which will do justice under the Constitution—not over it. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 Thus, the opinions of some Supreme Court Justices may be viewed as epistemic authorities because of the belief in the legal expertise of the Justices. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
The Judicial Conference, the self-governing body of the US Federal Courts—which reports to the Supreme Court—began considering modest disclosure requirements as far back as 2014. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
Justice Alito announced this standard in his Dobbs opinion overruling Roe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm by Jacob Fishman
., Edward Elgar 2023) The successor liability doctrine allows a court to hold a purchaser liable for the seller’s liabilities or tortious conduct. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
 Pix Credit hereIn a quite interesting case, the European Court of Human Rights issued its opinion and judgment in  Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
While there are legitimate differences of opinion regarding the proper balance between rule of law versus executive timidity, it is decidedly not the role of this Court to strike that balance. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:42 pm by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Furthermore, to determine impact beyond self-reporting, over the next year we will begin developing our methodology to assess the impact of the training on judicial decision making by exploring ways to access administrative court data and the judicial orders, memoranda, and opinions of our attendees. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
The traditional deference to political decision making at the heart of the act remains respected--the scope of judicial review would remain both unchanged and left to judicial development in case law. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
When the Supreme Court decided the Daubert case in June 1993, two recent verdicts in silicone-gel breast implant cases were fresh in memory.[1] The verdicts were large by the standards of the time, and the evidence presented for the claims that silicone caused autoimmune disease was extremely weak. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:11 am by Christine Corcos
The majority and dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court’s recent case on fair use, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:11 am
The majority and dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court’s recent case on fair use, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
De Girolami penned an op-Ed in the New York times arguing that recent important Supreme Court cases including the landmark opinions in Dobbs and Bruen rely on history and tradition in ways that are substantially different from both prior cases and originalism. [read post]