Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 81 - 100 of 2,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2020, 10:58 am by Henning Lahmann
Rather, I attempt to shed light on a few important points that—so far—have not received enough attention, in particular against the background of the 2007 International Court of Justice (ICJ) decision in Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 11:17 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
Background: Respondent Johnson filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in 2014. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 5:01 am
  Specifically, Respondents argued that Sun Life owed interest on the commutation figure, and initiated arbitration to resolve this issue.In granting the Respondents’ motion to stay and compel, the Court rejected Sun Life’s argument that the reinsurance contracts at issue were terminated (and thus arbitration was improper) when it paid Respondents the commutation amount determined by the panel. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:42 am by Aslam Moosajee
In FirstRand Bank Limited v Makaleng, Mr Makaleng was in arrears for R12 945.53. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Confiscation orders were made against each respondent for over £92m, based on the respondents’ benefit of the money passing through their bank accounts. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
There was, however, a dispute regarding the extent of the pre-settlement costs owed by the Respondent. [read post]