Search for: "P. v. Nichols" Results 81 - 100 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
We can find no clearer statement of judicial antipathy to expert witness advocacy than the famous copyright decision by Judge Learned Hand in Nichols v. [read post]
Eminent Domain - A Handbook of Condemnation Law (ABA 2011) (save yourself the entire Nichols set - here's a deskbook overview). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:06 pm by Jeralyn
In the 1895 Supreme Court decision, Coffin v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:45 am by Julie Lam
On May 25, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court granted the application for leave to appeal in Patterson v Nichols, Nos. 142438-9 and 142441, ordering that the cases be argued and submitted to the Court together. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Nichols, Faith-Based Family Laws in Western Democracies? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by INFORRM
A recent illustration is Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWHC 296 (QB), a libel claim brought by a social worker who had had some responsibility for “Baby P”, Peter Connelly, during his lifetime. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
However, this principle is not unlimited (see Cullen v Stanley [1926] IR 73 (SC); though quaere whether the case would be decided on its facts in the same way in the light of Quinlavan v O’Dea and Allister v Paisley above). [read post]