Search for: "People v Griffith" Results 81 - 100 of 183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am by Smita Ghosh
The Last Throes of the British Pro-Nazi Right, 1940-45), Bill V. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by Andrew Hamm
Supreme Court, Judges Thomas Griffith, Brett Kavanaugh and Robert Wilkins of the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am by Helen Klein Murillo, Alex Loomis
  Kavanaugh (with Brown and Griffith) Judge Kavanaugh, joined by Judges Brown and Griffith, authored the principal concurrence. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
It was largely thanks to the untiring efforts of people such as these that the far-sighted and patriotic Churchill could find himself described in late 1930s Britain as “unquestionably the biggest war-monger in the world today” and as a man of the ‘war psychosis’ (both quoted in Richard Griffiths&rsquo [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 10:46 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a petition for rehearing en banc in Sissel v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jacob: real consumers in the box are perfectly normal people. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
Morgan Griffith (R-VA), and Rep. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-0639, asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule conflicts with the retroactivity rule established in Griffith v. [read post]