Search for: "People v. Smith (1988)" Results 81 - 100 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Congress didn't want people to have to jump through a bunch of hoops just to prove what federal administrative agencies have said. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Smith, in 1920, the Court prohibited the use of direct democracy (in that case the referendum device, a close cousin of the initiative) that the people of Ohio tried to employ to undo the state’s (already finalized) ratification of a federal constitutional amendment under the terms of Article V of the Constitution, which also uses the word “Legislature. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 533 N.E.2d 748, 755 (Ohio 1988). [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 2008) (quoting Smith v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Med. 771 (1988); Joshua Muscat & Michael Huncharek, “Causation and disease: Biomedical science in toxic tort litigation,” 31 J. [read post]