Search for: "People v. Weed"
Results 81 - 100
of 456
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 3:26 am
If white and black people smoke weed at “approximately the same extent,” why are black people arrested at such higher frequency. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:13 pm
AustraliaX v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:17 pm
Yesterday marked the twenty-first anniversary of Olmstead v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
A quick Google search brings up references to at least seven different actions commenced across Canada in 2019 by various representative plaintiffs on behalf of proposed classes of people exposed to glyphosate. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
A quick Google search brings up references to at least seven different actions commenced across Canada in 2019 by various representative plaintiffs on behalf of proposed classes of people exposed to glyphosate. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm
This lengthy post will dive deeper into the weeds. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
Once again, a meta-analysis is advanced as a basis for an expert witness’s causation opinion, and once again, the opinion is the subject of a Rule 702 challenge. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:23 pm
After cannabis is decriminalized, he files a petition (as the statute allows) to vacate his conviction, but the trial court holds that making weed legal doesn't make it legal in prison.So he appeals, and gets appointed counsel for the appeal.He loses, with the Court of Appeal agreeing with the trial court.Normally, that would just mean that the defendant is back where he was initially. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
First, they want platforms to abide by a “duty of care,” going beyond today’s notice-and-takedown based legal models to more proactively weed out illegal content posted by users. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:28 pm
First, they want platforms to abide by a “duty of care,” going beyond today’s notice-and-takedown based legal models to more proactively weed out illegal content posted by users. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 1:38 pm
Before we get into the legal weeds, we need to set the context. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
MoMA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
Basically saying that you can't have "open" weed in your car (e.g., in an unsealed container or out in the open). [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:29 am
" Coates v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:08 pm
In R. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
We have so many other great FCIL print, electronic, and people resources. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 8:01 am
Oklahoma, Michigan v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 5:43 am
The court found in favour of Maradona, awarding damages amounting to EUR 70,000.PatentsAnnsley Merelle Ward reported on the decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in Teva v Gilead. [read post]
