Search for: "Petition of Reed"
Results 81 - 100
of 610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2015, 2:11 pm
This past week, the FCC finally released the long awaited TCPA Omnibus Declaratory Ruling and Order resolving 21 petitions on many issues associated with the enforcement and interpretation of the Act. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:15 am
Reed (09-559). [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 6:55 am
Reed, (WD WA, Sept. 10, 2009), a Washington federal district court granted a preliminary injunction against any public release of documents showing the names and contact information of individuals who signed petitions. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 6:06 am
Reed. [read post]
22 May 2007, 10:25 am
" We grant transfer. * * * We thus affirm the denial of Reed's PCR petition. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm
On October 6, 2014, the US Supreme Court denied Reed’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:39 pm
For years industry groups have been petitioning the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to clarify ambiguities in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which make it difficult for businesses to comply and leave them vulnerable to litigation. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:28 pm
Thorpe's petition, he asked for $65,844.08, $31,047.85 for Ms. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 8:55 am
Commissioner of Correction(Habeas corpus; whether habeas court properly denied petition for writ of habeas corpus; whether habeas court improperly rejected petitioner's claim that he had satisfied cause and prejudice test set forth in Reed v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:47 pm
Court reduces “Petition for Reasonable Attorneys Fees,” legal fees expert witness James King writes:W.D. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:24 pm
In a remand from the United States Supreme Court, the district court's opinion ordered disclosure of the names of those who signed an anti-same-sex marriage petition in Washington state in accordance with the state's usual processes. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:17 pm
Reed case. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:09 am
Reed, was just handed down yesterday, and is based on the signers' First Amendment rights to speak anonymously; the decision basically keeps in place the... [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:26 pm
Reed, -- S.Ct. --, No. 09-559, 2010 WL 2518466 (June 24, 2010): Many interesting things to say about this case upholding the facial validity of disclosure of the names/addresses of people who sign petitions that are placed on the ballot, but I was struck most initially by a bit in the dissent by Justice Thomas: A referendum supported by only one person’s signature is a nullity; it will never be placed on the ballot. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:54 am
They accuse Reed Group as an affiliate of Aetna of being negligent as well. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:27 pm
Of relevanceEricsson’s Reply discussed how interleaving is knownin the prior art, that Reed alone teaches interleavingpackets together, and that Reed and Mahany togetherteach the “interleaving packets together” limitation.In the Final Written Decision, the Board found thatEricsson had not proven the challenged claims obvious inlight of Reed and Mahany. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:09 am
This is right and important, though the State argued that signing a petition was a form of conduct, not speech, because petitions potentially have legal effects: with enough signatures, they put measures on the ballot to be voted on. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Reed, a case brought by Washington State ballot initiative petition signers trying to conceal their identities. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 12:51 pm
FEC SEEKS COMMENTS ON CONTRACTOR POLITICAL DONATIONS The Federal Election Commission seeks comments on a public Petition for Rulemaking to amend the Commission’s regulations regarding political contributions, to include certain factors for determining whether entities of the same corporate family are distinct business entities for purposes of the prohibition on contributions by federal contractors. [read post]
