Search for: "Powers v. Taylor" Results 81 - 100 of 865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2012, 7:10 am by Kali Borkoski
Taylor, Jr. for the Brennan Center for Justice and Gary Scharrer of the Houston Chronicle. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"The Association then initiated a CPLR Article 75 proceeding seeking a court order vacating the arbitration award dated December 4, 2014 on the grounds that the award "violated public policy considerations embodied in the Taylor Law" [Civil Service Law Article 14] and that the arbitrator had exceeded his power under the collective bargaining agreement between the Association and the TA. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am by Alfred Brophy
  This post talks about a list of about 120 books on the "black experience" that Judge Don Young ordered to be placed into the Marion, Ohio prison library back in 1972,  Taylor v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by JB
(The Supreme Court upheld federal power to regulate marijuana in Raich and again this Term in Taylor.) [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:26 am
Prohibited subjects of arbitrationMatter of County of Chautauqua v Civil Serv. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Negotiating disciplinary procedures for City of Schenectady police officers held a prohibited subject of collective bargainingCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
And on the merits, the military's highly inadequate Combatant Status Review Tribunals, which decide what suspects to incarcerate as "enemy combatants," do provide protections consistent with the Geneva Conventions and the Supreme Court's 2004 Hamdi v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm by The Federalist Society
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice GroupThe following audio was recorded on March 20, 2012. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court ruled that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil service commission becomes and is the actual appointing power" [People v Mosher, 163 NY 32].This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three,"… [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court ruled that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil service commission becomes and is the actual appointing power" [People v Mosher, 163 NY 32].This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three,"… [read post]