Search for: "Pro-Inspect Inc"
Results 81 - 100
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2016, 5:00 am
Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration placed Pro Armament Company LLC in its Severe Violator Enforcement Program after the company failed to correct serious violations identified in a November 2014 inspection. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
Leaving aside the separate question of the appropriateness of Canada’s refusing to inspect these goods for the common purpose of combatting counterfeiting, on any reasonableness basis, an obligation to provide periodic reports should be viewed as a win for Canada in this negotiation context. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
Inc., Admin. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm
In a federal court proceeding in late 2015, attorneys for the Valley Meat investors were working pro bono because there is no more money, but they were still searching for answers. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
NORMAN HARRIS SERVICES, INC.; GORDON CUTHBERTSON; and ENVIROGREEN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellees. 2nd District. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 10:03 pm
Nam & Nam Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 4:26 pm
Laboratories Inc. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:16 pm
The Stockholder refused and filed a pro se Complaint for Stockholder’s Right to Inspect requesting: 1) to gain immediate access to a copy of the books of account for inspection; 2) access to the Corporation’s photocopier free of charge; 3) the Corporation to pay for a complete audit of company records and 4) the Corporation to pay the Stockholder’s attorney’s fees and costs. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:34 am
Bouchard also cites Fulk v Washington Service Associates, Inc., 2002 WL 1402273 [Del Ch June 2 [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:32 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008)) between §510k “substantial equivalence” clearance and premarket approval. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
The other firewatcher agreed, but only added his name to blank inspections spaces. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:05 am
Lewis responded pro se, asserting several issues including a lack of standing and questions about the mortgage assignments. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 10:24 am
This blog recently detailed the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision in Pro-Build Holdings, Inc. to prohibit foreclosing lenders from invoking the protections of the judicially created implied warranty of workmanlike construction. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
Lewis responded pro se, asserting several issues including a lack of standing and questions about the mortgage assignments. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, or F.S.I.S. [read post]
Iowa Supreme Court limits a lender’s right to remedy of implied warranty of workmanlike construction
1 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Pro-Build Holdings, Inc. and United Building Centers (December 2014), the Iowa Supreme Court declined to allow a lender (which took a condominium property back via a deed in lieu of foreclosure) the right to bring a claim for breach of implied warranty of workmanlike construction, which is typically available to other homebuyers and owners of newly constructed buildings. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:14 pm
Jim-N-Jo’s ordered all fresh produce from Upper Lakes Foods, Inc. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am
Leinweber Co., Inc., Driv-Lok, Inc., Ford Motor Co., and ExxonMobil Oil Corp. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
Nunc pro tunc comes up:Gore argues that our case law preventssuch a retroactive agreement—but for support ofthis proposition, all Gore cites is precedent in which weconsidered agreements that were executed after the suitwas filed, such as Mars, Inc. v. [read post]
