Search for: "Regent v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 11:09 am
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
The federal law says that aliens not lawfully present in the United States can't get in-state tuition on the basis of residence within a state. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
In writing about the series of cases at the Supreme Court on primary liability (the Court has accepted certiorari in Stonebridge and has not ruled on the petition in Regents v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 2:25 pm
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003) and Regents of Universitv of California v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
In Regents v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 9:59 pm
Regents of the University of Minnesota. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
Bd. of Regents of the Univ. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 8:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 6:48 pm
After a long and contentious hearing in the case, Regents of the University of California v. the United States Department of Homeland Security, the judges of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, were ultimately convinced that the government’s decision to rescind the DACA program, “was motivated by unconstitutional racial animus in violation of the Equal Protection component of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:59 pm
Regents (.pdf) that ordinary contract rules apply to universities in their dealings with students, according to a previous decision in Kashmiri v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
The case, Covidien LP v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:58 am
(Judge Klein's lengthy opinion, Assoc. of Retired Employees, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Kehr, Fundamental Rights in the United States Court of Federal Claims, 35 Regent University Law Review 233-256 (2023).Ariel J. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:51 am
Erickson, 393 U.S. 385 (1969) and Washington v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:24 pm
Supreme Court ruling on DACA, Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
We have previously summarized the motions and responses filed in the Churchill v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
Here is the petition in White v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 11:32 am
We noted this anomaly in Cox Broadcasting [v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Under the circumstances, including LPN's admitted breach of the standards of honesty and integrity expected of a professional, the court said that the penalty imposed by the Board of Regents was not so disproportionate to her offense as to shock one's sense of fairness and dismissed LPN’s appeal.* Education Law §6509[5][a][i] indicates that “Being convicted of committing an act constituting a crime under: (i) New York State law” constitutes… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 3:23 pm
Regents on the day it was issued. [read post]
