Search for: "Richards v. Wright" Results 81 - 100 of 254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Slotnick, Richards & O’Neil, New York, New York, for amicus Association for Independent Music. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:54 pm by Scott Bomboy
“Governmental investigation and prosecution of crimes is a quintessentially executive function,” Scalia wrote in his dissent in a 1987 Supreme Court decision, Morrison v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of… [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
VMedia: The David and Goliath battle over the future of TV https://t.co/K4UEiDssBv -> Supreme Court Renders Landmark Privacy decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 12:18 pm by Frank Pasquale
To get a sense of how rural Democrats used to relate to voters, one need only pick up an old flyer from the [Wright] Patman archives in Texas: “Here Is What Our Democratic Party Has Given Us” was the title. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
Wright pleaded guilty but reserved his right to appeal the denial of suppression and now does so.U.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 7:24 am by Savanna Nolan
 In that case, a New York school board removed twelve books, including Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut,  The Best Short Stories by Negro Writers by Langston Hughes, and Black Boy by Richard Wright. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]