Search for: "Robert Davies v."
Results 81 - 100
of 1,197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
La corte Roberts: Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:30 am
By Seth Davis, Climenko Fellow (2011-2013), Harvard Law School For three decades the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts have worn away the foundations of Indian tribes’ sovereignty. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 3:06 am
Ro Khanna introduce legislation to punish employers whose workforce draws on government programs, and even lefty Center for Budget and Policy Priorities sees plenty of problems with that [Steve Goldstein/MarketWatch; Robert Greenstein, Sharon Parrott, Chye-Ching Huang, CBPP; Zuri Davis, Reason; related Ryan Bourne thread] “Prevailing Wage Legislation and the Continuing Significance of Race” [David E. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:31 pm
The Georgia Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Davis v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:31 pm
The Georgia Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Davis v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am
Earlier coverage of Maples v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Christopher Novus Davis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:55 pm
Davis, involves the possible implications of the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:29 am
” Robert P. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:29 am
” Robert P. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:10 am
Justice Gorsuch's majority opinion today in Davis, striking down a federal criminal statute as unconstitutionally vague, bears a close relationship, which is likely to be missed, to his dissenting opinion last week on the delegation doctrine in the Gundy case. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm
The SCOTUSblog case file for Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
Davis, No. 16-6219. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 8:16 am
Representing respondent Lois Davis, Raffi Melkonian argued that the court should apply the clear-statement rule from Arbaugh v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 4:31 pm
Armadale Publishers Ltd., [1979] 1 S.C.R. 1067, at p. 1090; Davies & Davies Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In a part of Bush v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:23 am
Thus, at least two of the remaining three Justices--Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy and Alito--must have agreed with Stevens, Ginsburg and Breyer that an evidentiary hearing should be held. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
On the eve of oral arguments, reporter Robert Barnes aptly summarized Trump v. [read post]
