Search for: "Shaw v. Peters"
Results 81 - 100
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
Shaw. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Bar No. 0330541 PETER J. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Shaw.[10] That is the highest penalty on record for a standalone violation of the rule. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
Keith Tallon Cook Taylor Caroline Landes McMillan Williams Helen MacDonald Aitken Associates Martin Wray Aitken Associates Kelly Wild Aitken Associates Peter Harris Harris Temperley Caron Theobalds Harris Temperley Stewart Hughan Harris Temperley Nina Shaw Harris Temperley Philip Wilkins Hudgell & Partners Elizabeth Bendall Sternberg Reed Gordon Reed Sternberg Reed Darren Ward Sternberg Reed Jenny Morrison Morrison Spowart Karen Forrester… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Shults and Peter B. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
Shaw, Shaw Keller LLP, Michael A. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
” Peter Spero, Asset Protection: Legal Planning, Strategies and Forms, 6.08[2] (Warren Gorham & Lamont, 2007), citing 2 A. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
” Peter Spero, Asset Protection: Legal Planning, Strategies and Forms, 6.08[2] (Warren Gorham & Lamont, 2007), citing 2 A. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The Fatal Flaws in the “Abortion Pill” Decision October 23, 2023 | Peter Grossi, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School By second-guessing FDA safety determinations, the Fifth Circuit challenges the Supreme Court to restore agency deference. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
., 2010.Constitutional LawKF4550 .T873 2010Why the Constitution matters / Mark Tushnet.Tushnet, Mark V., 1945-New Haven, Conn. : Yale University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF4550.Z9 L578 2010Keeping faith with the Constitution / Goodwin Liu, Pamela S. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Peter K. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
Appeal from Johnson district court; PETER V. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
I: Introduction During the uncertain times of World War II, Harvard University's president was interviewed concerning the condition of the law school. [read post]
