Search for: "State v. Cass" Results 81 - 100 of 335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 4:51 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Significantly, the letter of termination sent to Taylor failed to state that intoxication was the reason for his dismissal. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:12 am
Deferring imposing a disciplinary penalty equivalent to disciplinary probationMatter of Mele v New York State Off. of Gen. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court issued its decision in the copyright case Petrella v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
During the “disciplinary evaluation period” Petitioner was sent a letter of termination in which the appointing authority stated that “Petitioner failed to respond appropriately to an emergency situation. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:34 pm
Thanks to How Appealing, I saw this article in the latest issue of the Harvard Law Record headlined "Profs: District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 2:00 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 350 (1967), Boyd v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Disciplinary probationReillo v New York State Thruway Auth., 2018 NY Slip Op 02170, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentNew York State Thruway Authority employee Anthony Reillo was served with  disciplinary charges alleging certain misconduct. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Disciplinary probationReillo v New York State Thruway Auth., 2018 NY Slip Op 02170, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentNew York State Thruway Authority employee Anthony Reillo was served with  disciplinary charges alleging certain misconduct. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
The Supreme Court has even stated as much in its 1985 decision in Heckler v. [read post]