Search for: "State v. Egan"
Results 81 - 100
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 11:11 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 2.R. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:14 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
”The Appellate Division noted that in his decision in the first disciplinary proceeding, the Mayor not only agreed with the Hearing Officer's report, but also stated his own opinion that "I do not believe [Inspector 's] account of what was said. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 7:43 am
Egan. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Tessili v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
Ceresia, after a Frye hearing (see Frye v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:52 am
The case is Ryan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:52 pm
See Facebook, Inc. v Power Ventures, Inc. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
See, also, Laurido v Simon, 489 F. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
See, also, Laurido v Simon, 489 F. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Agri Processor v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
The privacy v security fallacy. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 6:38 am
On Thursday, John welcomed the long-delayed nomination of Brian Egan to be the new State Department Legal Adviser, and urged the Senate to quickly confirm him. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
Recognized analogous grounds under section 15(1) include sexual orientation (Egan v Canada), citizenship status (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia), and marital status (Miron v Trudel). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm
Archuleta 13-607Issue: Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred by reversing the United States Merit Systems Protection Board's (MSPB) interpretation of its enabling statute and extending Department of the Navy v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
” The panel relied heavily on Department of the Navy v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 6:43 pm
The 2001 SCC case Kay cites is Trinity Western University v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:00 am
(Egan v. [read post]
