Search for: "State v. Folks" Results 81 - 100 of 3,164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am by Aaron L. Nielson
If you want to learn more about him, the indispensable folks over at the D.C. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Before 1925, the states were free to abridge speech in any way they wanted consistent with state law. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: this is part of the challenge—innovation folks usually don’t have to think about public law and state v. federal. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Hall's holding on state sovereign immunity in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
The transition from first-to-invent to first-to-file has involved a number of quirks, the latest is found in SNIPR Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:34 am by Jon Hyman
Geiger doesn't like transgender people and is using her religion and the Supreme Court's decision in 303 Creative v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:21 am by SHG
Tim Cushing does an excellent job of saying what needed to be said about the Third Circuit’s decision in Fenico v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:16 pm by Karen Gullo
In a victory for transparency in police use of facial recognition, a New Jersey appellate court today ruled that state prosecutors—who charged a man for armed robbery after the technology showed he was a “possible match” for the suspect—must turn over to the defendant detailed information about the face scanning software used, including how it works, source code, and its error rate.Calling facial recognition “a novel and untested technology,” the court in… [read post]
29 May 2023, 6:20 pm by Stephen Halbrook
The Biden Administration is salivating at the prospect of United States v. [read post]