Search for: "State v. Taylor E."
Results 81 - 100
of 718
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 4:05 pm
§924(e)). [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 11:51 am
Applying Taylor v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
The magistrate judge's order states that the filter [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:58 am
Allen, --- U.S. at ----, 130 S.Ct. at 849 (choosing not to resolve the issue of Section 2254(e)(1)'s possible application to all challenges to a state court's factual findings); Rice v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:12 pm
Judge Vance E. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:36 am
Murphy, Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Work of the International Law Commission International DecisionsMaiko Meguro, State of the Netherlands v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:00 am
Taylor, 244 N.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Servs. v Mills, 4 NY3d 51.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet. ### The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual - a 645 page NYPPL e-book reviewing the relevant New York State laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Servs. v Mills, 4 NY3d 51.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet. ### The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual - a 645 page NYPPL e-book reviewing the relevant New York State laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Do you need to understand the most impactful 2023 L&E legal changes at the federal, state, and local levels? [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
See Mosby v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job.* Paragraph three of the agreement separately provided that Plaintiff agreed to adhere to departmental policies and procedures and would be terminated for his failure to do so, but provided no limitation on who would determine his guilt, nor did it waive any judicial review.The decision is posted on the… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job.* Paragraph three of the agreement separately provided that Plaintiff agreed to adhere to departmental policies and procedures and would be terminated for his failure to do so, but provided no limitation on who would determine his guilt, nor did it waive any judicial review.The decision is posted on the… [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 2:17 pm
Flynn, Taylor v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
And on the merits, the military's highly inadequate Combatant Status Review Tribunals, which decide what suspects to incarcerate as "enemy combatants," do provide protections consistent with the Geneva Conventions and the Supreme Court's 2004 Hamdi v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 8:51 am
The Honorable Judge William Fletcher Taylor-ed to a T.Menendez v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:47 am
Taylor, 529 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:02 pm
Braden, FDA’s Mike Taylor; USDA’s Alfred V. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 1:10 pm
See Mosby v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
