Search for: "Subsequent Injuries Fund v. I. A. C." Results 81 - 100 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
Furthermore, statements made by you during the background interview that you were under the influence’ of alcohol at the time of that incident, which subsequently caused substantial injury to a pedestrian. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:32 pm by emagraken
This is particularly so given the subsequent Supreme Court of Canada ruling in Wallace v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[v] The appearance of such proposal is that of a solution to all parts of the problem, when in fact it can have no effect upon the cost of legal advice services. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
Juror B's email also says that another juror (`Juror C’) asked `if I was going to drag this out any longer, because he had to return to work and was not getting paid. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 8:42 am by MBettman
Key Statute and Precedent R.C. 4123.01(C) provides that in order for an employee’s injury to be compensable under the workers’ compensation fund, the injury must be “received in the course of, and arising out of, the injured employee’s employment. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm by David Cosgrove
“‘Express authority is created when the principal explicitly tells the agent what to do’ and ‘[i]mplied authority consists of those powers incidental and necessary to carry out the express authority. [read post]