Search for: "US v. Abraham" Results 81 - 100 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The court was also unpersuaded by the university’s free association argument, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:22 am
 James AbrahamsJames Abrahams (8  New Square):  It seems that the "A" in "Abrahams" stands for "astute" as Chambers in 2015 and 2016 used that word to describe James, as well as noting him for his "excellent written and oral skills". [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:45 pm by Buce
He will be surprised, I think, to find how often the situation or context shows it to be used with ironical intent.' There is a story that Abraham Lincoln, on being told that in England no gentleman ever blacks his own boots, asked in his quiet manner, "Whose boots does he black? [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Abraham, a historian of the US Supreme Court, has died (WaPo). [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:50 am by INFORRM
However, it strikes us that this action is uncharacteristic of the ‘Government of the People, by the People, and for the People,’ famously envisioned by Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address over 140 years ago” The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to hear the case of Weise v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Adam Wagner
The cases involved a man and a woman who had been dismissed by the Royal Air Force and 2 men who had been dismissed by the Royal Navy  for being homosexual (see, respectively, Smith And Grady v United Kingdom and Lustig-Prean and Beckett v UK; also, the 2002 case of Beck, Copp and Bazeley v UK). [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:03 am by Robert Natelson (guest-blogging)
Accordingly, in late 1860 and early 1861, both the outgoing president, James Buchanan, and his successor, Abraham Lincoln, urged the states to apply for an Article V convention. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
And is Abraham Lincoln a plagiarist because of the "House Divided" speech; one thinks not. [read post]