Search for: "US v. Martin Jones" Results 81 - 100 of 251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2016, 11:38 pm by Jeff Nowak
Click here for the court’s take on Rodney’s Facebook photos and its quick dismissal of his FMLA claims: Jones v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:20 am by John Day
Martin, 305 S.C. 144, 146-47, 406 S.E.2d 372, 374 (1991) (finding a special duty for architects); Lloyd v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:00 am by Jim Liles and Melanie Martin-Jones
By Jim Liles and Melanie Martin-Jones In trademark infringement litigation, the critical and usually pivotal issue is whether there is a likelihood of confusion between two allegedly similar marks. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Securing the Homeland in the Post-Post 9/11 EraJohn Kelly, Secretary of Homeland Security Moderator: Pete Williams, Justice Correspondent, NBC News   No Room for Error: Advising the President on Homeland Security and CounterterrorismThomas Bossert, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Moderator: David Sanger, Chief Washington Correspondent, The New York Times   One Off or Turning Point: The Airstrike in SyriaJane Harman, President,… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness:… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:39 am by Russ Bensing
Jones teaches us one reason why there’s a court of appeals. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]