Search for: "United States v. Watkins"
Results 81 - 100
of 219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 6:56 pm
That was Justice Scalia this morning in Davis v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:24 am
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court established a six-factor test in Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:55 am
Watkins, 11 F.3d 1573, 1577–78 (Fed. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Watkins made its way up to the SCOTUS which held that Maryland's requirement for a person holding public office to state a belief in God violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Then there was the case of McGowan et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:21 am
In Geier, but not in Williamson, the United States government had supported preemption on the ground that allowing the state-law claims would conflict with agency objectives. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws preempt several provisions of Arizona’s S.B. 1070. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
When the United States Supreme Court addressed this problem with regard to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:33 am
United States, it seems the government had decided that it agreed with plaintiff Michael Greenlaw on the main sentencing-related issue in the case. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:07 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 4:22 am
In Santobello v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
The Michigan Supreme Court ordered that the application for leave to appeal in People v Yeakey, No. 142658, be held in abeyance pending the Michigan Supreme Court’s decisions in People v Pullen (No. 142751) and People v Watkins (No. 142031), which may resolve an issue raised in the application. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Ed. at 1045-47 (holding state could not criminalize teaching of German language to pupils who had not yet passed eighth grade); Watkins v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:21 am
” Among prosecutors in Texas — and the rest of the country — Watkins is a rare breed. [read post]
