Search for: "Warne v. Warne"
Results 81 - 100
of 19,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:30 am
However, in Bostock v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court took a significant step in Murray v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
” “Delaware Supreme Court Holds MFW Inapplicable Based on Banker Conflict Disclosure Deficiencies” — “The Delaware Supreme Court has reversed a Court of Chancery decision dismissing challenges to the acquisition of Inovalon Holdings, Inc. by a consortium led by Swedish private equity firm Nordic Capital in a decision demonstrating the importance of disclosure of financial advisor conflicts in order to obtain the benefit of business judgment rule review under Kahn… [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 am
Music producer Sherman Nealy initiated what would become Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:37 am
I was thinking about that, and the fact that not every horse could have taken Mystik Dan’s remarkable inside run to a win in the Kentucky Derby, while still musing on the summary judgment ruling in Sellers v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 11:00 pm
And because he ignored warnings to avoid doing so, the AD1 thought that a slip and fall was to be expected under those circumstances and was of the view the denial of accidental disability benefits was thus appropriately premised.Ironically, that outcome was no accident, either.# # #DECISIONMatter of R. v Sewell [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
In the following guest post, James L. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in People of the State of New York v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
.), entered December 22, 2022, which denied the petition to annul respondents' determination, dated November 10, 2021, denying petitioner's application for accidental disability benefits (ADR), and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.Petitioner did not sustain his burden of showing that his injuries resulted from an accident within the meaning of Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-252, rather than the foreseeable… [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
.), entered December 22, 2022, which denied the petition to annul respondents' determination, dated November 10, 2021, denying petitioner's application for accidental disability benefits (ADR), and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.Petitioner did not sustain his burden of showing that his injuries resulted from an accident within the meaning of Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-252, rather than the foreseeable… [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:25 am
The Miranda warning originated from the case of Miranda v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
