Search for: "Fall v. State Bar"
Results 981 - 1000
of 4,476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2018, 9:04 am
He also argued that Gersh did not allege a sufficient basis under state law. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:31 pm
In Cahaly v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 12:45 pm
Co. of N.Y. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:46 am
Hearsay is not admissible unless it falls within one of the exceptions found in the evidence rules. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:50 am
” Similarly, the Appellate Division, Second Department in Adesso Café Bar & Grill, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 11:48 am
That case should be a relief; after considering the weighty constitutional concerns summarized in my preview in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:47 am
State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:15 am
Earlier this fall, a divided panel of the Sixth Circuit reversed the district court's conclusion that the claims against Ohio State were barred by the statute of limitations. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Lamelas notes that Intel Corp. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
It should also be noted that there is no bar to providing information pursuant to a FOIL request, or otherwise, that falls within one or more of the statutory exceptions that the custodian could rely upon in denying a FOIL request, in whole or in part, for the information or records demanded. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
This post includes a little more information about the Geneva Bar Association (Française). [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:12 pm
The D.C. legislation would lift that tax bar, with the District of Columbia joining states like New York and Illinois in allowing private parties to take on a tax enforcement function typically restricted to government. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:02 am
Lowrey v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:02 am
Lowrey v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:10 am
Celeste Walker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
Both the state trial court and the state intermediate appellate court held that the suit was barred because Congress had repealed the private right of action under TISA, but the California Supreme Court reversed, holding that Congress had not barred state-law suits based on a violation of TISA. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
That almost certainly means the state court would not rule before sometime next fall, allowing the case to then return to the Ninth Circuit for its consideration of whether to let the case go forward, or to dismiss it based on a finding that no one has “standing” to defend the law in the place of state officials. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
The NY State Health Department has a regulation barring the use of state medicaid funds to cover the cost of gender reassignment and related treatments. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:16 pm
BLUE WATER PARTNERS, INC. v. [read post]
