Search for: "In re: United Mine"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,978
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Pollard on Inmate Litigants, a recent paper of mine that appeared in the Akron Law Review. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 5:57 am
They are those "we’re in the upper middle class, it has to be a degree from an elite school" people who look at their kid and think: Egad, what an insufferable drudge sprang forth from my loins and yet I must tiger-mom forward and ensure that the prize is mine hers. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Pollard on Inmate Litigants, a recent paper of mine that appeared in the Akron Law Review. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 8:33 am
We’re seeing that play out today with regard to video surveillance, for example. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Similarly, United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
Now, I am willing to bet that you’re thinking, What works in Denmark may not work here in the United States (except for Legos, beer and Bang & Olufsen speakers). [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
Now, I am willing to bet that you’re thinking, What works in Denmark may not work here in the United States (except for Legos, beer and Bang & Olufsen speakers). [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
It seems like only yesterday when we mined some goodies from an unpublished case. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm
Noerr Motor Freight (1961), which arose in the legislative context, and United Mine Workers v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:29 pm
But as a friend of mine recently put it, any condemnation of slavery must be on the grounds of natural justice. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
; (2) A second concern of mine relates to Christie’s failure to explain why he did not talk to Ms. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
Ben Nighthorse Campbell, 409 F.3d 1234, 1235-36 (10th Cir. 2005); In re Grand Jury Investigation, 399 F.3d 527, 529 n.1 (2d Cir. 2005); United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:00 pm
This reminds me of an old joke: What is the first word an immigrant learns upon moving to the United States? [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
Readers, scholars, researchers, and others used the service to find books, engage in data and text mining, and to obtain alerts to the exist [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
The court’s dismissal “without prejudice” merely reflects the parties’ agreement that the ’105 patent claim could be re-filed in future litigation between these parties. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Dr. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 12:00 pm
You’re thinking Citizens United v. [read post]
