Search for: "Mark Cover"
Results 981 - 1000
of 18,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2020, 5:42 pm
& Mark Rosch. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:16 am
According to Marks, air carriers are covered mostly by reinsurers who assume most of the liability from the primary insurers, who only assume typically 2% to 4% of the risk for air accidents. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Exemption 5 covers records protected by the attorney-client, deliberative process, and attorney work-product privileges. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
Hence, a new assessment will need to be conducted to determine if the advertisement at issue would satisfy the conditions above.Parody under trade mark lawMoving on to trade mark law, as stated, the Court of Appeal had concluded that the advertisement had not infringed Zorro Productions’ trade mark rights because:The actor playing Zorro was not depicted while drinking the bottled water commercialized by CO.GE.DI (though he held it!) [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
The use of the name 'BANKSY' in connection to merchandising "without any specific relation to the exhibition" made it apparent how the intention would be purely commercial and such as to conflict with the scope of the trade mark registrations, which also cover goods in Class 16. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:22 am
Says Ken Auletta in The New Yorker (where the punctuation is presumably punctilious, but that's a question without a question mark).Yet this much is clear: journalists are supposed to be more transparent than the politicians we cover. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 6:12 am
Gladin, Mark J. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 3:49 am
In addition, 18 third-party registrations covering both types of goods demonstrated that the involved goods are of a type that may emanate from a single source under one mark. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:03 am
KERRYGOLD sued for infringement (throwing in a dilution claim too), and the Spanish court decided that because the similarity lay in the KERRY element of the trade marks which was just a geographical location, and there was a co-existence agreement covering the UK and Ireland, there was no likelihood of confusion. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 8:43 pm
If you have questions or would like to discuss further, contact Cyber Security, Data Breach & Privacy Chair Mark Rasch at mdr@kjk.com or 301.547.6925. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 8:51 am
This will cover: • scientific advice on the food safety aspects of date marking • assessment and labelling of ingredients/foods with food safety implications (e.g. allergens, glycols, high caffeine, high glycyrrhizinic acid) • food safety aspects of organic food and of foods controlled by compositional standards • treatments and conditions of use with food safety implications (e.g. quick frozen foods, raw drinking milk and pasteurisation, food contact materials)… [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:43 am
”Can a Flavor be Trade Marked? [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:59 am
by Mark I. [read post]
21 May 2021, 11:00 am
The anonymous graffiti artist known as Banksy is no stranger to trade mark wrangling, with this week’s cancellation decision by the European Union Intellectual Property Office’s Cancellation Division following hot on the heels of similar proceedings last September, concerning the work 'Flower Thrower' (covered by the IPKat here). [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 3:13 am
Applicant owned a registration for the same mark ALLEGIANCE STAFFING for the same services covered by the subject application. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:20 am
For further questions or clarifications regarding the content of this article, please contact KJK Cyber Security & Data Breach attorney Mark Rasch (MDR@kjk.com; 301.547.6925). [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:01 am
Yet the Wolf had purchased a patent from a ‘defunct company’ which (it alleged) covers Ditto’s virtual try-on service, and was now suing California-based Ditto in the distant Land of Utah. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:37 am
Attorney Mark A. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 8:14 am
Allegedly, he used his expense account to cover up an affair/sexual harassment. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 1:14 am
Were you sad because you thought that your favorite IP-related saga [I am, of course, referring to the Louboutin Red-sole saga, the C- 163/16 preliminary ruling before the Cour of Justice of the European Union covered by The IPKat here , here and here and the following decision by the referring court, the Court of The Hague, covered by The IPKat here] had come to an end? [read post]
