Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
‘The fountain pen slows you down, and makes you think,’ said John C. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:51 am
Neill, and Jamie C. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 7:33 am
I’m not entirely sure on what basis the difference with leasehold cases like Earle v Charalambous (our note) is made out. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:20 am
The AUSA could tell the court that (a) the CLOUD Act removed the blocking statute in UK for wiretaps by the US, (b) neither the Wiretap Act nor the Fourth Amendment apply to non-US persons outside US, (c) all steps for interception will be outside the US, and, (d) upon delivery of the “CLOUD Act order” issued by the court, the UK will certify it to BT who will implement it per the US-UK Agreement. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:30 am
” (14 CFR § 91.119(c).) [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
Under G.S. 15A-1231(b), failures to comply with the statute do not constitute grounds for appeal unless the defendant is “materially prejudiced. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
There’s a lot to cover, so I’m going to do these one at a time. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
After inquiring with Enterprise, police discovered that the Suburban was being rented by one Aaron Hernandez of 22 Ronald C. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:01 am
[b.] [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
The High Court accepted that it was at least arguable that there was an analogy with civil proceedings, where, as per CPR 44.3(5) costs are proportionate if they bear a reasonable relationship to (a) the sums in issue in the proceedings; (b) the value of any non-monetary relief in issue in the proceedings; (c) the complexity of the litigation; (d) any additional work generated by the conduct of the paying party; and (e) any wider factors involved in the proceedings, such as… [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
But each largely makes four basic points: (a) The concept of executive privilege is hotly disputed; (b) there are very few relevant court cases and none that provide definitive answers; (c) there are a number of historical incidents, from the administration of George Washington to that of Barack Obama, that are of debatable—and contested—significance; and (d) the legal resolution of these highly disputed questions is likely of little practical significance. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
B. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am
(b) The second point is about the way a reviewing officer treats medical evidence, as against the authority’s own advisors. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 7:08 pm
On Dec. 10, 1948, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 217A, proclaiming and adopting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 7:54 am
The case being appealed There were two children - N and M. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Briefly put, the statute repeats parts of the common law definition of defamation, see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 559, comment b, which the Alaska Supreme Court in Gottschalk v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:48 am
Over at National Review, former federal prosecutor Andrew C. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:04 am
The 2018 resolution still generically urges states to comply with their human rights (and refugee and humanitarian law) obligations in countering terrorism (paragraph 2), and expresses concern at state violations (paragraph 5), but backslides on human rights in three key respects: (a) It weakens the human rights standards in the previous resolutions, (b) it shifts the emphasis to rights abuses by terrorists rather than states and (c) it downplays the importance of human rights in… [read post]
