Search for: "United States v. Edward"
Results 981 - 1000
of 2,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2017, 8:48 am
(quoting Edwards Lifesciences LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
Emily Watkins, Damon Dawain Edwards, Edward J. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
United States, reversing a fisherman’s conviction under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized grouper, garnered significant coverage and commentary. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
United States and concludes that “[t]he smart money is that the Court will take Justice Scalia’s suggestion and simply strike the residual clause, thereby leaving only the listed offenses. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:04 am
United States had the earmarks of the latter. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:35 am
Edwards. 514 U.S. 300 (1995). [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Wiretap Applications Did Not Need to Allege Probable Cause That Controlled Substance Was in Khat Leaves United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 8:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 1:58 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
United States, 134 S.Ct. 881, 892 (2014)(quoting Commissioner v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 2:14 am
On September 28, 2021, Judge Edward M. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 11:11 am
Their first joint complaint was dismissed by Judge Edward Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, but without prejudice, and the plaintiffs brought an amended complaint. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:52 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
United States (1997), in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
