Search for: "Gibson v. State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Brittany Gibson and Madison Fernandez (Politico) | Published: 10/5/2023 A company at the center of the Democratic Party’s digital strategy is on the verge of a meltdown, sparking alarm among a broad constellation of liberal groups that are relying on it ahead of 2024. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Maybe our motto here at DDLaw should be “we read law review articles so you don’t have to. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Oberlin Review had a news piece on Oberlin College announcing it will appeal the June jury verdict that sided with Gibson’s Bakery. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:57 am by Kara OBrien
 Our friends at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher sent in this memo detailing the agreement and what it might mean for future SEC actions. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:58 am by Richard Renner
United States Dep’t of Labor, 134 F.3d 1292, 1295 (6th Cir. 1998). [read post]