Search for: "Grant v. U. S"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 3,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 6:55 am
" Rice v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am
United States, 483 U. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Zora Franicevic and Connor Grant-Knight provide Cornell’s preview of Vance, and Jim Wheaton previews the case for Subscript Law. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:24 am
In Kinder Morgan Energy v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
McDonough, 547 U. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:32 am
in Karambelas v Law Off. of Mark S. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:07 am
A motion to dismiss based on documentary evidence may be granted “where the documentary evidence utterly refutes plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter oflaw” (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
4 May 2020, 8:47 am
Today, the Supreme Court granted review in Edwards v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
The Circuit Court also held that the general grant of jurisdiction in Section 1331 does not trump "the Little Tucker Act's specific and limited grant of jurisdiction. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
Kinney v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
In the dissent’s view, the Supreme Court foreclosed debate when it summarized in DeShaney v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed Mr. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
S. 244 (1888); and Callaghan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
S. 244 (1888); and Callaghan v. [read post]
