Search for: "New v. State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 107,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
New York State's Human Rights Law requires the compliant to be filed with the State Division of Human Rights within one year of the most recent act of the unlawful discrimination alleged2017 NY Slip Op 06968, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Petitioner in this action, a long-term, at-will employee of the Town, was advised that his employment would be terminated as part of the Town's transitioning to the incoming administration of a newly elected Town… [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 12:24 pm
The Fifth Circuit, in an opinion released today in the appeal of Tuepker v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court considered the principle established in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex p Onibiyo [1996] QB 768, that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new case denied Tuesday was United Airlines v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:37 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY, RUTGERS' BOARD OF GOVERNORS and M. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 7:49 am by Land Use Prof
As expected, the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, struck down Mora County, New Mexico's ban on hydraulic fracturing. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 5:17 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion today in Schroeder v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Today, we’re doing something a little different, taking our cue from a recent New York state appellate decision:  Brown & Brown, Inc. v. [read post]
The post South Carolina judge upholds state’s abortion ban, sends challenge to state Supreme Court appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:12 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
New Jersey the United States Supreme Court established that any finding that increases the maximum sentence to which a defendant may be sentenced is an element of the offense that must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]