Search for: "Robert Burns"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Burns, A THEORY OF THE TRIAL (1999)David T. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:22 am
A watchdog group filed a complaint alleging Burns violated state laws against using corporate money for donations. [read post]
6 May 2022, 3:00 am
Recently, Roberts even went public with a warning over “inappropriate political influence” affecting the court. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
There are a variety of moves the Biden Administration could take to hasten the demise of coal-burning power plants. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
" However, Burns points out that the Court's decision not to consolidate Skilling's case with two other "honest services" cases, Weyhrauch v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
Judge Lungstrum explained: While the court does not doubt that a judge would have wanted to know that the field test kits that Deputy Burns and Deputy Blake were using tended to yield false positive results “at a high rate,” there is simply no evidence that Deputy Burns or Deputy Blake had any knowledge of that information. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:16 am
Don’t burn down a nation unless you’re certain that’s what you want to do. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:14 am
Robert Jay QC: And why? [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 6:05 am
" In 1973 (at age 80) a series of burned canvasses. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 3:15 am
Early on, Roberts writes, in a passage worth quoting at length, “It is hard to pin down what prison abolition means. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:24 pm
” “In what way is that threatening,” Roberts asked, “regardless of the tone? [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).David BernsteinIn this symposium, my designated task was to review and discuss Part V of Robert Post, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024) This Part delves into social and economic legislation during the Taft Court era. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
Robert Welch, the Supreme Court extended the restrictions on defamation liability first announced in NY Times v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
That’s a good start, according to Robert Johnson, founder of the Black Entertainment Network. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:00 pm
That’s a good start, according to Robert Johnson, founder of the Black Entertainment Network. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Galloway (1941, Colo.) 114 P2d 550, [spinal tap]; Burns v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
Michelle Burns, U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Burns, the Supreme Court held that treating government jobs as patronage typically violates the First Amendment right of expressive association. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Robert B. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 9:34 am
" The same sort of reasoning explains why a State may outlaw cross burning (and only cross burning) done with the intent to intimidate: "because burning a cross is a particularly virulent form of intimidation. [read post]
