Search for: "Cooper v. California"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
CPD will continue to cooperate with federal authorities in investigating and apprehending violent criminals who may be undocumented immigrants. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 7:44 am
"] From Judge Danielle Forrest's opinion in Williamson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 6:28 pm
But in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:36 pm
ShareOn Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Biden v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:29 am
[2] Henderson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Cooper, et al. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
They would be asking the California courts to declare Proposition 8 unconstitutional -- after its constitutionality (under State law) had already been upheld by the California Supreme Court [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Ash v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am
The announcement comes a month after China’s anger was provoked by a State Department report claiming that China had been limiting counterterrorism cooperation with the United States. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am
Cooper-Ponte discusses it in more depth on her piece on derogations. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Officers had reason to believe that their informant was truthful and that his tip was reliable where: 1) the informant was under arrest on a possessory offense and had every incentive to cooperate with the police; 2) he believed that his phone calls to arrange a drug deal with Defendant were being recorded; and 3) every bit of information that he provided was quickly borne out by actual events. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
As California Supreme Court Justice and Stanford Visiting Professor Mariano-Florentino Cuellar has explained, U.S. corporations use the law in the same way. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In Lafler v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
App. 1989); Cooper v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Cooper Wiring Devices, Inc., No. 06-763, 2007 WL 2891401 (N.D. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Yee, 15-169, addresses whether California laws regarding unclaimed property are a “taking” for Takings Clause purposes. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:53 pm
EPA could not set future carbon standards and could not allow California to do so. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:25 am
He also points out that under the California Supreme Court case Ross v. [read post]
