Search for: "People v. Peter" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,932
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Peter Menell – Economic Analysis of Copyright Notice In land, notice is a magic bullet: inform people in advance of rights and boundaries—a really good focal point for notice generally. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" Vice Chancellor Donald Parsons, Jr.: "Delaware decisions like Caremark and Stone v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:11 pm by Steven Berk
  Citigroup puts out some less-than-honest materials that allows it to make a lot of money, and consequently other people to lose a lot of money, and the SEC fines them for that. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:18 pm by Shawn Wright
   In most people facing this type of situation, these exceptions can be avoided by simply waiting a longer period of time before filing their bankruptcy case. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 10:29 am by TJ McIntyre
The Opinion of the Advocate General in Scarlet (Extended) v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:11 pm by Steven Berk
  Citigroup puts out some less-than-honest materials that allows it to make a lot of money, and consequently other people to lose a lot of money, and the SEC fines them for that. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 3:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" 70,000 people in the US are over 100. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am by Charon QC
This law gave effect to European Directives and Regulations going back as far as 1997, and had been brought to the insurers’ attention then, and again in 2002 (Sarwar v Alam). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am by Charon QC
This law gave effect to European Directives and Regulations going back as far as 1997, and had been brought to the insurers’ attention then, and again in 2002 (Sarwar v Alam). [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]