Search for: "U.S. v. Nelson"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,072
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Nelson dismissing the appeal for want of a substantial federal question. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:04 am
Chevron, 467 U.S. at 843. [read post]
22 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm
Figure 1: Futures v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
Niven v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:12 pm
Nelson, et al. (09-530). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
ANA SILVA YANEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
Republican donor and former activist investor John Paulson, floated by Trump as a potential U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 3:30 am
Of course, the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
PNP v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Promoting Best Practices for U.S. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:12 am
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson & Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest SEC developments. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
Ease the Burden With the Right Policy - bit.ly/wSrAFt (Marisa Peacock) Wikileaks Backers Lose Battle to Keep Twitter Data from U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:15 am
” [28] Defined as “designated payment systems”, the UIGEA covers any system that that facilitates money transfers that the US government determines to be used by illegal gambling sites.[29] Despite the UIEGA , sites like PokerStars have publically announced that it will ignore the Act and continue operations as usual, claiming that the law applies to games of chance, and that poker is a game of skill and therefore not regulated.[30] Recently, the U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:05 am
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson & Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest SEC developments. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 5:01 am
NLRB (1937), the U.S. [read post]
