Search for: "United States v. Minnesota"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2014, 9:02 pm
Dean. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
The Impact of Windsor These recent rulings are fueled by the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
Bucci and Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In January 2012, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Minnesota v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:19 pm
(“Camtek”) in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, alleging that Camtek infringed U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 11:55 am
United States, the Supreme Court rejected tax exceptionalism... [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 am
As of today, this is a largely unsettled issue in both the United States and Europe, and there are many differing viewpoints. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:50 am
They include generally liberal states such as Hawaii, Minnesota, and Rhode Island, as well as conservative ones such as Alaska, Arkansas, and South Carolina. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm
To resolve this issue, one party must demonstrate they used the mark in commerce before the other party, thereby entitling that party to register the trademark at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 am
Proia, Freeing the Prop 8 Tape: Perry v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
United States, 915 F.2d 699, 712 (D.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
” “Health Hazard Progress Notes: Compensation Advance Made in New York State,” 16(5) Asbestos Worker 13 (May 1966). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:40 pm
Reconsidering how federal courts choose applicable nonfederal laws would also provide an opportunity to reconcile Klaxon’s irrebuttable preference for intrastate uniformity with the more flexible default rule in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
United State ex rel. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
While the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 3:30 am
This working paper does not analyze legal issues in the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
For students outside the United States, university enrollment is acceptable.Professional CategoryAuthors may be legal practitioners, business professionals and/or academics. [read post]
