Search for: "Campbell v State"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 2,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
Campbell, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: Dana J. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:17 am
Rush v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
Ex. 114, ¶5, in Smith v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Whereas Weird Al’s Grammy-winning song fits snugly within the parody definition (and Yankovic always seeks permission, in order “to maintain relationships”), Dumb Starbucks position is questionable.ParodyIn the landmark decision addressing fair-use in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc the US Supreme Court stated that parody "is the use of some elements of a prior author's composition to create a new one that, at least in… [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court held in Campbell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm
Increasingly doing doctrinal work—Campbell, then Blanch v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
The Ninth Circuit arguably erred because, while relying on the US Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 US 569 (1994), it overlooked the part of Campbellin which the majority stated that the defence of fair use may apply to a satire if “there is little or no risk of market substitution [of the original work with the later work], whether because of the large extent of transformation of the earlier work, . . . [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
Campbell, Judge.Representing Appellants: Angela C. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:54 am
While the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit gave every indication at a December hearing that the grossly erroneous non-copyrightability holding in Oracle v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:03 am
Contract law: Consider Campbell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE INTEREST OF LB, BO, KO, Minors, STATE OF WYOMING, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
However, the explanatory notes to the Act indicate that the new defence is intended to reflect the common law as set out in Flood v Times Newspapers [2012] UKSC 11, in which Lord Mance stated that it would seldom be in the public interest “…to publish material which has not been the subject of responsible journalistic enquiry and consideration. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Libel and Privacy Trials this Term in Northern Ireland There are four libel jury trials listed in Northern Ireland this term: 20 January 2014, O’Kane v Sunday Newspapers and Campbell v Sunday Newspapers, Time estimate, 4 days 23 January 2014, Loony v Hanna 10 February 2014, Patterson v Ministry of Defence, Time estimate, 10 days 12 February 2014, Watson v Sunday Newspapers, Time estimate, 3 days We thank Olivia O’Kane of Carson… [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
MOATS v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
Campbell Alliance Group, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:00 pm
Land Court Update - Huelo Hui, Campbell Real Estate Contract Interpretation Update - Kutkowski v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm
Plaintiff also stated that Defendant required her to dance at particular times. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
Ben Nighthorse Campbell, 409 F.3d 1234, 1235-36 (10th Cir. 2005); In re Grand Jury Investigation, 399 F.3d 527, 529 n.1 (2d Cir. 2005); United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
Case Name: JOY KLOMLIAM v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
