Search for: "Does 1-25 inclusive"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2011, 11:27 pm
Under the HCSA, that's the last level of decision-making priority. 755 ILCS 40/25. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
The Court noted that the plaintiffs demand letter estimated $4 million in potential PAGA penalties, $1 million in other penalties, and just under $5 million in wages owed. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm
” Op. at 25. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 11:09 am
Courtney Michelle Love and Does 1-25 inclusive, Case No. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
Products 4U does not own the AdWord "Wintersteiger" on the Austrian Google.at. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
This decision deals with the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED).Claim 1 of the main request on file read:1. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:00 am
As we previously reported, document corrections under Notice 2010-6 that are implemented before 2011 are treated as having been corrected on January 1, 2009, which can mean that any requirement of income inclusion under 409A as a condition of the relief would generally not apply. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:06 am
Group 1 1. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 8:32 pm
Group 1 1. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:46 am
And even though I haven’t succeeded in many other ways as yet, that does in fact make it all worth it. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm
[See Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.] [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
This limitation means that, to plead an unpreempted claim, a plaintiff has to allege something that’s: (1) a violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), and (2) also a violation of independent state law. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm
Nor does the family consultant make “findings” in the sense that the term is applied to judicial determinations. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am
The rush of commentary on the proxy access rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 25, 2010, which provide certain shareholders with the right to require that companies include shareholder-nominated director candidates in company proxy materials, dissipated quickly when the Commission stayed the effective date of the rules. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
In X & Y v Persons Unknown ([2007] 1 FLR 1567 at [42]-[49]). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:12 pm
Most of the revisions deal with the H-1B visa, e.g. concerning EAR / ITAR export control compliance (pg. 5), off-site assignments (pg. 19), and the new H-1B / L-1 fee (pg. 25). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:11 am
If you like to get ahead of the game, why wait till 25 December to celebrate Christmas when you can go to The Intellectual Property Lawyers’ Organisation (TIPLO) Christmas dinner meeting in the Old Hall at Lincoln’s Inn on Wednesday, 1 December. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:07 am
While it does not apply to the entire process, the Canadian domestic criminal law applies to extradition bail. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
On that basis the report would engage article 8(1). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 4:07 am
(5) the photograph of the plaintiff and his partner. [25] As the address of the plaintiff had been dealt with under Article 2, the judge did not consider it further. [read post]
