Search for: "J.A." Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Dear Friends:Just wanted to tell you about this case that was recently decided against Aurora Loan Services. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by MacIsaac
[19]         The use and misuse of the term “proximate cause” was discussed by Smith J.A. in Chambers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:09 am by MacIsaac
 Eggleston was contributorily negligent. [72]        If I am wrong in that conclusion, based upon the analysis and conclusions of Esson J.A. in Giuliani, I would assess Mr. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm by Michael Webster
Karakatsanis of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting as the Divisional Court, dated April 27, 2009.ARMSTRONG J.A. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:21 pm by MacIsaac
In that case Doherty J.A., delivering the judgment of the Court, said at pages 215 to 216: Admissions, which in the broad sense refer to any statement made by a litigant and tendered as evidence at trial by the opposing party, are admitted without any necessity/reliability analysis. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm by INFORRM
In a strong dissent, Juriansz J.A. stated that s. 2(b) does not create a right of access to information in the possession or under the control of a government. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:35 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Tang Lay Lee & Francis Regan, Legal aid for the disabled in transitional China Ronagh J.A. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 4:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
There is no escape from careless drafting such as this:An “error” may have occurred in drafting claim 16, as Haemonetics’s counsel indicated during the district court’s claim construction hearing, J.A. 923, but it is what the patentee claimed and what the public is entitled to rely on. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:31 pm
An "error" may have occurred in drafting claim 16, as Haemonetics's counsel indicated during the district court's claim construction hearing, J.A. 923, but it is what the patentee claimed and what the public is entitled to rely on. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:19 pm by MacIsaac
  In doing so I am taking in mind both the utility of such comments expressed by Southin J.A. in Johnson, and the limits to them as stated by Garson J.A. in Boota. [52]        In my opinion, as a long-time member of the bench, the jury’s award in this case has surpassed the level of “shockingly unreasonable”. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:26 am by Schachtman
.*, and Ulizio, J.A.1             Parallel developments in mid-20th century medicine and American tort law resulted in the need to resolve factual disputes about events several decades old. [read post]
14 May 2010, 11:28 am by MacIsaac
.), Southin J.A. described the same insurer’s agreement to pay the plaintiff’s costs in a “test case” as “a very proper thing to do”, and ordered costs in those terms. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:21 am by MacIsaac
.), Doherty J.A explained relevance as follows: … Relevance … requires a determination of whether as a matter of human experience and logic the existence of “Fact A” makes the existence or non-existence of “Fact B” more probable than it would be without the existence of “Fact A. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:26 am
Three recent cases before the CAFC went to challenges to patent term extension. [read post]