Search for: "California v. Arizona"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,005
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 8:28 am
The resulting undercount will cost states like Arizona, California, Florida, and New York a seat in Congress, votes in the Electoral College, and billions in federal funding. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
The case, titled Casey Taylor, et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
For Capitol Media Services (via Tucson.com), Howard Fischer reports that the court “spurned a bid by Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich to sue California over how it applies its business tax on residents and investors here. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:07 am
[3] Skidmore v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
In Rescuecom Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:46 pm
California law was pretty bare on this, according to the cites in Enovsys v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that “[t]he justices, over a dissent by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, blocked a federal appeals court decision that would have let future asylum seekers stay in the U.S. temporarily while their applications are being processed[; t]he appeals court ruling, which would have applied to new applicants in California and Arizona, was set to take effect Thursday. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:52 am
” In re Coordinated PreTrial Proceedings in Petroleum Prod- ucts Antitrust Litigation, 658 F.2d 1355, 1358 (9th Cir. 1981) (citing Gas-A-Tron of Arizona v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Alaska 1987).Arizona: Gaston v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 6:52 pm
VALERIE WALKER, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:10 am
In Ross v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 11:38 am
Michaels argues that the 9th Circuit majority’s opinion conflicts with Arizona v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:11 pm
In Tate v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
California’s 60-Day “For Further Study Rule. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 10:27 am
Rizo v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:30 pm
Marin, Marguerite V. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 8:09 pm
Consider the Class II provisions of Indian Gaming Regulatory Act that Congress enacted after California v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:20 am
Youngblood and California v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:25 am
He also points out that under the California Supreme Court case Ross v. [read post]
