Search for: "John David Cross"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
The great John Mackey was its first major figure. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:35 pm
Law reform: 740 articles, including: "The Global Dimensions of Rape-Law Reform: A Cross-National Study of Policy Outcomes," By: Frank, David John; Hardinge, Tara; Wosick-Correa, Kassia. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
Claim-Suppressing Arbitration: The New Rules David S. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
(They also weren't allowed to cross their legs or wipe their brows. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:21 am
eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A Civil Procedure Car Crash - http://tinyurl.com/4gvfvq9 (Josh Gilliland) Amendments To Expert Witness Discovery Under Federal Rule 26 - http://tinyurl.com/4spj8wx (David Lender, Kevin Meade) Businesses Head Off eDiscovery Costs – http://tinyurl.com/4kwf4fa (Jason Krause) Can You Trust Your Data? [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Cross Med. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:40 am
Nobody was charged when 9 year old Rebecca Johns was hit and killed as she tried to cross a road in Franconia. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:28 am
(David S. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 11:58 am
District Associate Judge, John G. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:44 am
John Lynch, in a letter to the committee, said he will support the bill. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:44 am
The Times got in on the action with no less a personage than Lord David Pannick QC having a pop at the judge who recently disgraced herself when up before the magistrates herself…. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 9:37 am
Johnson, Book Note, Reviewing John H. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:35 am
Post hoc calculations of power were once in vogue, but have now routinely been condemned by biostatisticians and epidemiologists in studies that report confidence intervals around estimates of associations, or “effect sizes. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:20 pm
What David Hylton and others have shown is that there is really no need for tort reform. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Favre, David. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:55 am
I’m voting “no” to all of the State Bar’s ill-thought-out and unnecessary amendments to the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:43 am
By: David A. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm
You won't find S. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:27 pm
• Worse, proposed Rules 1.06 and 1.07 cross-incorporate each other: you must satisfy both before you can represent any multiple clients. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
By: David A. [read post]
